Transparency in administration Make corruption past
RTI APPLICATION U/S OF 6(1) OF RTI ACT-2005.
From 04-07-2011
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
No.13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street,
M.G.R.NAGAR,
CHENNAI-78.
To
The Public Information Officer,
CBI- ACB
Shasthri bhavan,
Haddows Road,
Chennai.
Sir,
Sub: Under the Right to Information Act 2005, sec 6(1) . I request you to furnish
the case detail of Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran.
Ref : 1. Case id no.R-020/2009 ACB, Chennai dt 24 April -2009. Sp report dated 10-05-2010.
-----
I request you to furnish information about number case filed regarding Bribe, disapproriate assets, scam in issusing Takkal passport and misuse of office against the Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai.
1.Kindly inform no. of case filed against the Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai.
by ACB, Chennai from 01/01/2009 to 30/06/2011. Kindly inform case Id no. date.
2. kindly supply copy of sanctioned letter for Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai.
send by the sanctioning authority to ACB, Chennai.
3. kindly inform whether Director general of posts, Dak bhavan, new Delhi has send sanction letter for case id no R-020/2009 ACB, CHENNAI 24-april-2009. If sanctioned by authority, kindly supply copy of it.
4. kindly inform number of sanction pending from the sanctioning authority for the Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai. Kindly inform sanction pending authority name and address.
Yours
(V.GOPALAKRISHNAN)
I enclosed ten rupees postal order towards RTI fee . postal order no.
Friday, July 8, 2011
cbi rti application
Transparency in administration Make corruption past
RTI APPLICATION U/S OF 6(1) OF RTI ACT-2005.
From 04-07-2011
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
No.13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street,
M.G.R.NAGAR,
CHENNAI-78.
To
The Public Information Officer,
CBI- ACB
Shasthri bhavan,
Haddows Road,
Chennai.
Sir,
Sub: Under the Right to Information Act 2005, sec 6(1) . I request you to furnish
the case detail of Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran.
Ref : 1. Case id no.R-020/2009 ACB, Chennai dt 24 April -2009. Sp report dated 10-05-2010.
-----
I request you to furnish information about number case filed regarding Bribe, disapproriate assets, scam in issusing Takkal passport and misuse of office against the Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai.
1.Kindly inform no. of case filed against the Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai.
by ACB, Chennai from 01/01/2009 to 30/06/2011. Kindly inform case Id no. date.
2. kindly supply copy of sanctioned letter for Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai.
send by the sanctioning authority to ACB, Chennai.
3. kindly inform whether Director general of posts, Dak bhavan, new Delhi has send sanction letter for case id no R-020/2009 ACB, CHENNAI 24-april-2009. If sanctioned by authority, kindly supply copy of it.
4. kindly inform number of sanction pending from the sanctioning authority for the Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai. Kindly inform sanction pending authority name and address.
Yours
(V.GOPALAKRISHNAN)
I enclosed ten rupees postal order towards RTI fee . postal order no.
RTI APPLICATION U/S OF 6(1) OF RTI ACT-2005.
From 04-07-2011
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
No.13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street,
M.G.R.NAGAR,
CHENNAI-78.
To
The Public Information Officer,
CBI- ACB
Shasthri bhavan,
Haddows Road,
Chennai.
Sir,
Sub: Under the Right to Information Act 2005, sec 6(1) . I request you to furnish
the case detail of Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran.
Ref : 1. Case id no.R-020/2009 ACB, Chennai dt 24 April -2009. Sp report dated 10-05-2010.
-----
I request you to furnish information about number case filed regarding Bribe, disapproriate assets, scam in issusing Takkal passport and misuse of office against the Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai.
1.Kindly inform no. of case filed against the Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai.
by ACB, Chennai from 01/01/2009 to 30/06/2011. Kindly inform case Id no. date.
2. kindly supply copy of sanctioned letter for Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai.
send by the sanctioning authority to ACB, Chennai.
3. kindly inform whether Director general of posts, Dak bhavan, new Delhi has send sanction letter for case id no R-020/2009 ACB, CHENNAI 24-april-2009. If sanctioned by authority, kindly supply copy of it.
4. kindly inform number of sanction pending from the sanctioning authority for the Former Regional Passport officer, Sumathi RaviChandran and and Her husband Dr. Ravichandran Health Officer in Corporation of Chennai. Kindly inform sanction pending authority name and address.
Yours
(V.GOPALAKRISHNAN)
I enclosed ten rupees postal order towards RTI fee . postal order no.
Friday, July 1, 2011
ips officer illegal occupying quarters
http://www.tnpolice.gov.in/pdfs/ips_list.pdf
IGP QUARTERS
N.Tamil selvan No.1, IGPs Quarters nill
p.c.lallawsanga No.2, IGPs Quarters Nill
Md.ShakeelAKHTER 19891039 FLAT NO.3 IGPs Quarters Having own in his wife at manapakkam, house let out forRent house Rs.35,000/p.a.
Sathish kumar dogra Flat no.4/48, IGPs Quarters Nill
m.s.jaffar sait No.5, IGPs Quarters Having own plot in his name in mogappair, house let out forRent house Rs.2,000/p.m (built area 248.41 sq.metre nearly one ground)
Sarabjit singh No.6, Igp quarters Nill
s.k.upadhay No.7, IGP quarters Nill
Dr.k.Radhakrishnan No.8, IGPs Quarters N.A.
Mithilesh kumar jha No.9, IGPs Quarters Nill
VIJAYAKUMAR 19871083 FLAT NO.10, IGPs Quarters Nill
FLAT NO.11. igp quarters
Narinder pal singh Flat no.12, IGPs Quarters Nill
DIG quarters
sanjeev kumar Flat no.1, block-1, DIG quarters Nill
KANhu charan mahali 19891081 No.2, block-1,DIG QUARTERS Nill
SANJAY ARORA 19881011 NO.3, block-1,DIG Quarters Nill
N.CHENBAHARAMAN19902088 NO.4, block-1,DIG QUARTERS Nill
SUNIL KUMAR 19881073 NO.5 , block-1, DIG Quarters Nill
K.N.SATHIYAMURTHY 19972097 FLAT NO.6, BLOCK-1, DIG QUARTERS Having own in his wife at manapakkam, house let out forRent house Rs.50,000/p.m from November 2008.
DR.K.JAYANTH MURALI 19911037 NO.1, BLOCK-2,DIG QUARTERS Having own house, plot no.30 at manapakkam, house let out forRent house Rs.5,01,308/per annum
R.C.Kudawla No.2, block-2, DIG Quarters Nill
R.S.NALLASIVAM 19952095 FLAT NO.3, BLOCK NO.2, DIG QUARTERS Nill
I.RAJA FLAT NO.4, BLOCK-2, DIG QUARTERS Nill
P.SAKTHIVELU 19942156 FLAT NO.5, BLOCK-2, DIG QUARTERS nill
M.N.MANJUNATHA 19911046 NO.6, BLOCK-2, DIG QUARTERS Nill
SP/DC QUARTERS
B.SHAMOONDESWARI NO.1, DC QUARTERS
K.JOSHI NIRMAL KUMAR NO.2, DC QUARTERS Nill
SONAL V.MISRA 20001001 FLAT NO.3, DC QUARTERS Nill
E.SELVIHEMA PIRAMILA FLAT NO.4, DC QUARTERS
A.RADHIKA NO.5, DC QUARTERS Nill
B.VIJAYAKUMARI FLAT NO.5, DC QUARTERS Nill
S.SANTHI NO.6, PH ROAD, KILPAUK
M.VIJAYALAKSHMI NO.6, DC QUARTERS
K.SOKKALINGAM 19932086 NO.7, SP/DC QUARTERS
R.SAMUTHIRPANDI 19992052 NO.7, DC QUARTERS Having own house in his name at manapakkam,
N.BASKARAN 19992051 FLAT NO.8, DC QUARTERS Nill
N.DEVARANI NO.9, DC QUARTERS
S.LAKSHMI(srilakshmi Prasad) NO.12, DC QUARTERS Having own house in mylapore and pallavaram, getting rent of rs.30,000/-
K.SHANMUGAVEL 19982099 IPS OFFICERS QUARTERS,KILPAUK
IGP QUARTERS
N.Tamil selvan No.1, IGPs Quarters nill
p.c.lallawsanga No.2, IGPs Quarters Nill
Md.ShakeelAKHTER 19891039 FLAT NO.3 IGPs Quarters Having own in his wife at manapakkam, house let out forRent house Rs.35,000/p.a.
Sathish kumar dogra Flat no.4/48, IGPs Quarters Nill
m.s.jaffar sait No.5, IGPs Quarters Having own plot in his name in mogappair, house let out forRent house Rs.2,000/p.m (built area 248.41 sq.metre nearly one ground)
Sarabjit singh No.6, Igp quarters Nill
s.k.upadhay No.7, IGP quarters Nill
Dr.k.Radhakrishnan No.8, IGPs Quarters N.A.
Mithilesh kumar jha No.9, IGPs Quarters Nill
VIJAYAKUMAR 19871083 FLAT NO.10, IGPs Quarters Nill
FLAT NO.11. igp quarters
Narinder pal singh Flat no.12, IGPs Quarters Nill
DIG quarters
sanjeev kumar Flat no.1, block-1, DIG quarters Nill
KANhu charan mahali 19891081 No.2, block-1,DIG QUARTERS Nill
SANJAY ARORA 19881011 NO.3, block-1,DIG Quarters Nill
N.CHENBAHARAMAN19902088 NO.4, block-1,DIG QUARTERS Nill
SUNIL KUMAR 19881073 NO.5 , block-1, DIG Quarters Nill
K.N.SATHIYAMURTHY 19972097 FLAT NO.6, BLOCK-1, DIG QUARTERS Having own in his wife at manapakkam, house let out forRent house Rs.50,000/p.m from November 2008.
DR.K.JAYANTH MURALI 19911037 NO.1, BLOCK-2,DIG QUARTERS Having own house, plot no.30 at manapakkam, house let out forRent house Rs.5,01,308/per annum
R.C.Kudawla No.2, block-2, DIG Quarters Nill
R.S.NALLASIVAM 19952095 FLAT NO.3, BLOCK NO.2, DIG QUARTERS Nill
I.RAJA FLAT NO.4, BLOCK-2, DIG QUARTERS Nill
P.SAKTHIVELU 19942156 FLAT NO.5, BLOCK-2, DIG QUARTERS nill
M.N.MANJUNATHA 19911046 NO.6, BLOCK-2, DIG QUARTERS Nill
SP/DC QUARTERS
B.SHAMOONDESWARI NO.1, DC QUARTERS
K.JOSHI NIRMAL KUMAR NO.2, DC QUARTERS Nill
SONAL V.MISRA 20001001 FLAT NO.3, DC QUARTERS Nill
E.SELVIHEMA PIRAMILA FLAT NO.4, DC QUARTERS
A.RADHIKA NO.5, DC QUARTERS Nill
B.VIJAYAKUMARI FLAT NO.5, DC QUARTERS Nill
S.SANTHI NO.6, PH ROAD, KILPAUK
M.VIJAYALAKSHMI NO.6, DC QUARTERS
K.SOKKALINGAM 19932086 NO.7, SP/DC QUARTERS
R.SAMUTHIRPANDI 19992052 NO.7, DC QUARTERS Having own house in his name at manapakkam,
N.BASKARAN 19992051 FLAT NO.8, DC QUARTERS Nill
N.DEVARANI NO.9, DC QUARTERS
S.LAKSHMI(srilakshmi Prasad) NO.12, DC QUARTERS Having own house in mylapore and pallavaram, getting rent of rs.30,000/-
K.SHANMUGAVEL 19982099 IPS OFFICERS QUARTERS,KILPAUK
I-T dept relents, furnishes details of ex-MLA’s returns
Publication: The Times Of India Chennai; Date: Jun 6, 2011; Section: Times City; Page: 5
I-T dept relents, furnishes details of ex-MLA’s returns
Jeeva | TNN
Chennai: The income-tax department, which had been refusing to furnish details of I-T returns to right to information (RTI) applicants, has finally chosen to do so under the RTI Act.
The department has furnished the I-T returns of D Ravikumar of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), the former MLA of Kattumannarkoil in Cuddalore district, for the accounting years 2008-09, 2009-10, in response to an RTI application by V Gopalakrishnan, an activist in KK Nagar. Disclosure of details of Ravikumar’s I-T returns gains importance as the department has been rejecting the RTI applications seeking income-tax returns of public servants.
Last month, the department dismissed the RTI requests of Gopalakrishnan, when he sought the I-T returns of DMK president M Karunanidhi, Union home minister P Chidambaram, Union textiles minister Dayanidhi Maran, Rajya Sabha MP Kanimozhi and former telecom minister A Raja, as all of them had objected to the disclosure. And, in the case of an RTI query seeking the I-T returns of Union fertilizers minister MK Alagiri, the department rejected it without even calling for his objection.
The I-T returns of Ravikumar, furnished by the incometax office in Cuddalore, shows that he got Rs 5.75 lakh as salary and allowances as an MLA during 2009-10 and the value of his assets was about Rs 31 lakh as on March 31, 2010.
However, the income-tax department’s Chennai office has refused to furnish the I-T returns of Ravikumar’s party as the VCK objected. Strongly opposing the applicant’s request, the VCK said: “The information sought by the applicant is personal in nature and also consists of important and sensitive details of the party, along with information pertaining to persons and entities associated with the party.”
The department in its RTI reply said it had asked the party’s objections, if any, under Section 11 of the RTI Act. The provision says that a PIO, where he intends to disclose any information or record on a RTI request which relates to or has been supplied by a third party and has been treated as confidential by that third party, shall give a written notice to such third party. And the objection, if any, of the third party should be considered while taking a decision about disclosure of information.
I-T dept relents, furnishes details of ex-MLA’s returns
Jeeva | TNN
Chennai: The income-tax department, which had been refusing to furnish details of I-T returns to right to information (RTI) applicants, has finally chosen to do so under the RTI Act.
The department has furnished the I-T returns of D Ravikumar of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), the former MLA of Kattumannarkoil in Cuddalore district, for the accounting years 2008-09, 2009-10, in response to an RTI application by V Gopalakrishnan, an activist in KK Nagar. Disclosure of details of Ravikumar’s I-T returns gains importance as the department has been rejecting the RTI applications seeking income-tax returns of public servants.
Last month, the department dismissed the RTI requests of Gopalakrishnan, when he sought the I-T returns of DMK president M Karunanidhi, Union home minister P Chidambaram, Union textiles minister Dayanidhi Maran, Rajya Sabha MP Kanimozhi and former telecom minister A Raja, as all of them had objected to the disclosure. And, in the case of an RTI query seeking the I-T returns of Union fertilizers minister MK Alagiri, the department rejected it without even calling for his objection.
The I-T returns of Ravikumar, furnished by the incometax office in Cuddalore, shows that he got Rs 5.75 lakh as salary and allowances as an MLA during 2009-10 and the value of his assets was about Rs 31 lakh as on March 31, 2010.
However, the income-tax department’s Chennai office has refused to furnish the I-T returns of Ravikumar’s party as the VCK objected. Strongly opposing the applicant’s request, the VCK said: “The information sought by the applicant is personal in nature and also consists of important and sensitive details of the party, along with information pertaining to persons and entities associated with the party.”
The department in its RTI reply said it had asked the party’s objections, if any, under Section 11 of the RTI Act. The provision says that a PIO, where he intends to disclose any information or record on a RTI request which relates to or has been supplied by a third party and has been treated as confidential by that third party, shall give a written notice to such third party. And the objection, if any, of the third party should be considered while taking a decision about disclosure of information.
I-T returns not confidential: Official
Politicos I-T returns not confidential: Official
June 16, 2011
Deccan chroncile
June 15: Contrary to the common reasons cited to reject applications under the RTI Act for copies of I-T returns of assessees, a central public information officer (CPIO) attached to the chief commissioner of income tax said that the Income Tax Act has no provision to treat the returns filed by assessee as confidential. The I-T department had refused to disclose I-T returns filed by assessee including politicians stating that it is “private information”, “confidential or third party information”, “covered under fiduciary relationship”, “unwarranted invasion of privacy” and “does not involve public interest”.
The PIO stated this in reply to a RTI petition filed by a city-based activist C. Selvaraj. To a query on fiduciary relationship between officials of IT department and assessee, the PIO said, “There is no direct definition for “fiduciary relations” in I-T Act. The information relating to assessees can be supplied as per section 138 of I-T Act. Any authority that contravenes the section 138 in giving information is punishable under section 280 of the I-T Act. Further information respecting assessee is published as per section 287 of the act.”
The RTI Act clearly states that all the information, which cannot be denied to the State Legislature or the Parliament, shall not be denied to any person. When asked whether the IT department would provide the IT returns of assessee to the Parliament or the Assembly or not, the CPIO said, “The department is duty bound to supply any information sought by the legislative authorities such as the Parliament.” Right to information activist V. Gopalakrishnan, who unsuccessfully filed petitions seeking returns of various Tamil Nadu politicians including former chief minister M. Karunanidhi, former telecom minister A. Raja and Rajya Sabha MP Kanimozhi, said most of petitions were rejected on the basis that it was confidential or third party information.
“The replies given to Mr Selvaraj’s queries only shows that the public information officers in the I-T department are ignorant of their I-T Act.”
June 16, 2011
Deccan chroncile
June 15: Contrary to the common reasons cited to reject applications under the RTI Act for copies of I-T returns of assessees, a central public information officer (CPIO) attached to the chief commissioner of income tax said that the Income Tax Act has no provision to treat the returns filed by assessee as confidential. The I-T department had refused to disclose I-T returns filed by assessee including politicians stating that it is “private information”, “confidential or third party information”, “covered under fiduciary relationship”, “unwarranted invasion of privacy” and “does not involve public interest”.
The PIO stated this in reply to a RTI petition filed by a city-based activist C. Selvaraj. To a query on fiduciary relationship between officials of IT department and assessee, the PIO said, “There is no direct definition for “fiduciary relations” in I-T Act. The information relating to assessees can be supplied as per section 138 of I-T Act. Any authority that contravenes the section 138 in giving information is punishable under section 280 of the I-T Act. Further information respecting assessee is published as per section 287 of the act.”
The RTI Act clearly states that all the information, which cannot be denied to the State Legislature or the Parliament, shall not be denied to any person. When asked whether the IT department would provide the IT returns of assessee to the Parliament or the Assembly or not, the CPIO said, “The department is duty bound to supply any information sought by the legislative authorities such as the Parliament.” Right to information activist V. Gopalakrishnan, who unsuccessfully filed petitions seeking returns of various Tamil Nadu politicians including former chief minister M. Karunanidhi, former telecom minister A. Raja and Rajya Sabha MP Kanimozhi, said most of petitions were rejected on the basis that it was confidential or third party information.
“The replies given to Mr Selvaraj’s queries only shows that the public information officers in the I-T department are ignorant of their I-T Act.”
I-T returns not confidential: Official
Politicos I-T returns not confidential: Official
June 16, 2011
Deccan chroncile
June 15: Contrary to the common reasons cited to reject applications under the RTI Act for copies of I-T returns of assessees, a central public information officer (CPIO) attached to the chief commissioner of income tax said that the Income Tax Act has no provision to treat the returns filed by assessee as confidential. The I-T department had refused to disclose I-T returns filed by assessee including politicians stating that it is “private information”, “confidential or third party information”, “covered under fiduciary relationship”, “unwarranted invasion of privacy” and “does not involve public interest”.
The PIO stated this in reply to a RTI petition filed by a city-based activist C. Selvaraj. To a query on fiduciary relationship between officials of IT department and assessee, the PIO said, “There is no direct definition for “fiduciary relations” in I-T Act. The information relating to assessees can be supplied as per section 138 of I-T Act. Any authority that contravenes the section 138 in giving information is punishable under section 280 of the I-T Act. Further information respecting assessee is published as per section 287 of the act.”
The RTI Act clearly states that all the information, which cannot be denied to the State Legislature or the Parliament, shall not be denied to any person. When asked whether the IT department would provide the IT returns of assessee to the Parliament or the Assembly or not, the CPIO said, “The department is duty bound to supply any information sought by the legislative authorities such as the Parliament.” Right to information activist V. Gopalakrishnan, who unsuccessfully filed petitions seeking returns of various Tamil Nadu politicians including former chief minister M. Karunanidhi, former telecom minister A. Raja and Rajya Sabha MP Kanimozhi, said most of petitions were rejected on the basis that it was confidential or third party information.
“The replies given to Mr Selvaraj’s queries only shows that the public information officers in the I-T department are ignorant of their I-T Act.”
June 16, 2011
Deccan chroncile
June 15: Contrary to the common reasons cited to reject applications under the RTI Act for copies of I-T returns of assessees, a central public information officer (CPIO) attached to the chief commissioner of income tax said that the Income Tax Act has no provision to treat the returns filed by assessee as confidential. The I-T department had refused to disclose I-T returns filed by assessee including politicians stating that it is “private information”, “confidential or third party information”, “covered under fiduciary relationship”, “unwarranted invasion of privacy” and “does not involve public interest”.
The PIO stated this in reply to a RTI petition filed by a city-based activist C. Selvaraj. To a query on fiduciary relationship between officials of IT department and assessee, the PIO said, “There is no direct definition for “fiduciary relations” in I-T Act. The information relating to assessees can be supplied as per section 138 of I-T Act. Any authority that contravenes the section 138 in giving information is punishable under section 280 of the I-T Act. Further information respecting assessee is published as per section 287 of the act.”
The RTI Act clearly states that all the information, which cannot be denied to the State Legislature or the Parliament, shall not be denied to any person. When asked whether the IT department would provide the IT returns of assessee to the Parliament or the Assembly or not, the CPIO said, “The department is duty bound to supply any information sought by the legislative authorities such as the Parliament.” Right to information activist V. Gopalakrishnan, who unsuccessfully filed petitions seeking returns of various Tamil Nadu politicians including former chief minister M. Karunanidhi, former telecom minister A. Raja and Rajya Sabha MP Kanimozhi, said most of petitions were rejected on the basis that it was confidential or third party information.
“The replies given to Mr Selvaraj’s queries only shows that the public information officers in the I-T department are ignorant of their I-T Act.”
service tax received from assessese
Transparency in administration Make corruption past
RTI APPLICATION U/S 6(1) OF RTI ACT-2005.
From 14-06-2011
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
No.13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street,
M.G.R.NAGAR,
CHENNAI-78.
To
The Public Information Officer,
(under the RTI ACT-2005),
Commisioner of Service Tax,
M.H.U.Complex, No.692, Anna Salai
Nandanam, Chennai-600035
Sir/ madam,
Sub: I request to furnish Revenue received and not received from assessee, which is ready available IN ELECTRONIC FORM and CD, in your office copies under 6(1) of RTI Act-2005.
------
1.kindly supply the list of name, address, service tax no., registered as service Tax assessee, service tax paid ( Revenue received from the Assessee) from 1/4/2005 to 31/03/2011. (supply in electronic form or CD, yearwise).
2. kindly supply the list of name, address, service tax no., registered as service Tax assessee, service tax not( Revenue not received from the Assessee) paid from 1/4/2005 to 31/03/2011. (supply in electronic form or CD, yearwise).
3.kindly arrange for inspection and take photo copies for the above serial no. 1 and serial no.2.
I enclosed Indian postal order of Rs.10/- towards RTI fee, 92E 556859
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
RTI APPLICATION U/S 6(1) OF RTI ACT-2005.
From 14-06-2011
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
No.13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street,
M.G.R.NAGAR,
CHENNAI-78.
To
The Public Information Officer,
(under the RTI ACT-2005),
Commisioner of Service Tax,
M.H.U.Complex, No.692, Anna Salai
Nandanam, Chennai-600035
Sir/ madam,
Sub: I request to furnish Revenue received and not received from assessee, which is ready available IN ELECTRONIC FORM and CD, in your office copies under 6(1) of RTI Act-2005.
------
1.kindly supply the list of name, address, service tax no., registered as service Tax assessee, service tax paid ( Revenue received from the Assessee) from 1/4/2005 to 31/03/2011. (supply in electronic form or CD, yearwise).
2. kindly supply the list of name, address, service tax no., registered as service Tax assessee, service tax not( Revenue not received from the Assessee) paid from 1/4/2005 to 31/03/2011. (supply in electronic form or CD, yearwise).
3.kindly arrange for inspection and take photo copies for the above serial no. 1 and serial no.2.
I enclosed Indian postal order of Rs.10/- towards RTI fee, 92E 556859
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)