Various complaint to president of India.

Registration Number	:	PRSEC/E/2013/13659
Name Of Complainant	:	M/s gopalakrishnan
Date of Receipt	:	25 Aug 2013
Received by	:	President's Secretariat
Officer name	:	Shri K.C. Jayarajan
Officer Designation	:	Addl CPH
Contact Address	:	Rashtrapati Bhawan
		New Delhi
		110004
e-mail	:	kc.jayarajan@nic.in
Grievance Description	:	sir, tax evasion made by TANSI, ch-32. TANSI furniture works, guindy ch-32 not added excise duty, cess in bill for furniture items supplied to official residence of former chief judge of madras high court , judges, and a present minister of tamilnadu. document evidence forwarded to your email id:presidentofindia@rb.nic.in
Current Status	:	RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE

**************************** Registration Number	:	PRSEC/E/2013/03255
Name Of Complainant	:	M/s gopalakrishnan
Date of Receipt	:	18 Feb 2013
Received by	:	President's Secretariat
Forwarded to	:	SECRETARY P AND AR
Officer name	:	UNDER SECRETARY
Officer Designation	:	UNDER SECRETARY
Contact Address	:	THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
		PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT,
		SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI600009
Grievance Description	:	From 18-02-2013 V. Gopalakrishnan 13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street, m.G.R.Nagar, Chennai-78. To THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA, Rashtrapathy Bhavan, New Delhi-110 004. Sir, Sub: Tamilnadu RTI (fees) rules-2005, -mode of payment of further fee towards cost of information –incorporation of Indian postal order, court fee stamp, revenue stamp pay order, Non Judicial paper and electronically enabled medium in TN state authority - reg. ------ For the payment of further fee for obtaining the information, presently cash/D.D/ remittance in a particular A/c number are permitted. This is causing much difficulty in making the above payment by the applicants. Most of the PIOs in Tamilnadu are not in the authority to receive cash in their office. Hence the applicants are pillar to post making the payment at some other designated place, where they demand for some sort of authorization to receive the amount. Obtaining a D.D is costly affair, besides the officials at the Bank are reluctant to prepare the D.D because of the lengthy A/c head which is hard to be accommodated in the available space (enclosed copy). To overcome these avoidable difficulties experienced by all concerned, we propose to bring in an amendment in the rules, incorporating the postal order, court fee stamp, revenue stamp pay order, Non Judicial paper and electronically enabled medium also towards application fee as well as for the further fee, as the postal order available in all the post offices in rural areas also and the same is very easy for handling purpose. Here with I enclosed the Gazette copies for your kind perusal. In some state like Gujarat, West Bengal and Bihar state governments accepting Indian postal order, court fee stamp, pay order, Non Judicial paper and electronically enabled medium, even accepting Revenue stamp for RTI application fee, further fee for RTI, Central govt also accepting postal order. Kindly may be pleased to direct the Governor of Tamilnadu to bring in an amendment in the Tamilnadu RTI (fees) rules-2005, like above mentioned states. V. Gopalakrishnan
Date of Action	:	09 Jul 2013

*****************************

Registration Number:PRSEC/E/2012/15338Name Of Complainant:Mr. gopalakrishnanDate of Receipt:25 Sep 2012Received by:President's SecretariatForwarded to:SECRETARY P AND AROfficer name:UNDER SECRETARYOfficer Designation:UNDER SECRETARYContact Address:THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,

PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI600009Grievance Description:To The president of india, new Delhi sir, Mrs B Neelambikai was a former member of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission between 2004 and 2010. was appointed has TN information commissioner violating article 319. she was taken employment in government. please take necessary action. recommend for cancelling her appointment order. Thanks v.gopalakrishnan 9884782686 Article 319. Prohibition as to the holding of offices by members of Commission on ceasing to be such members: On ceasing to hold office- the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission shall be ineligible for further employment either under the Government of India or under the Government of a State. the Chairman of a State Public Service Commission shall be eligible for appointment as the Chairman or any other member of the Union Public Service Commission or as the Chairman of any other State Public Service Commission, but not for any other employment either under the Government of India or under the Government of a State. a member other than the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission shall be eligible for appointment as the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission or as the Chairman of a State Public Service Commission, but not for any other employment either under the Government of India or under the Government of a State. a member other than the Chairman of a State Public Service Commission shall be eligible for appointment as the Chairman or any other member of the Union Public Service Commission or as the Chairman of that or any other State Public Service Commission, but not for any other employment either under the Government of India or under the Government of a State http://ibnlive.in.com/news/new-information-commissioners-for-tn/287626-60-118.html http://www.tnpsc.gov.in/constitution-provision.htmlDate of Action:19 Mar 2013

************************ Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2013/14259 Name Of Complainant : M/s gopalakrishnan Date of Receipt : 03 Sep 2013 Received by : President's Secretariat Officer name : Shri K.C. Jayarajan Officer Designation : Addl CPH Contact Address : Rashtrapati Bhawan New Delhi 110004 e-mail : kc.jayarajan@nic.in Grievance Description : VIOLATING THE HIGH COURT JUDGES (SALARIES AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ACT 1954, AND RULES. cHIEF JUDGE AND MOST JUDGES OF CHENNAI HIGH COURT ARE VIOLATING THE ABOVE ACT AND RULES FOR THE FOLLOWING. 1. made re-imbursement on charges on account of power more than 10,000/- units per annum by the Pay and account office, high court, chennai. 2. Payment made for charges on account of power more than 10,000/- units per annum by the Pay and account office, high court, chennai to official residence of judges in Greensways road, chennai. 3.Payment made for charges on account of water more than 3600 kilolitres per annum by the Public work department chennai to official residence of former chief judges shri Y.Iqbalin Greensways road, chennai. 4.salary Payment made for the account of Maazodor 3 persons by the Public work department, chennai to official residence of judges in Greensways road, chennai there was no provision in above said act and rules to provide free maazodor to chief judges and other judges. 5. supplying more free furnishing items beyond 1,50,000 to rent free offical residence of chief justices and judges and not collecting rent for free furnishing items supplied beyond Rs.1,50,000/- by Public work department. 6. The perquisites value like rent free residence, free furnishing items , Tv, refrigerator, washing machine, Ac,Greyasor, free mazadorar,free Gardener, free water , free current are NOT added under section 17(2) of income tax act. i having documents evidence received under Right to information from Various department like Public work department, pay and Accounts office. Please take necessary to quash some government order issued by the tamilnadu government which are against the THE HIGH COURT JUDGES (SALARIES AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ACT 1954, AND RULES. Please collect amount from individual judges (a)for payment like mazadorar , gardener, excess free furnishing items, etc., (b) excess payment made for current and water. (c) collect income tax for the perquisites received and usuage. Current Status : RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE **************************** Registration Number                 PRSEC/E201314157 : Name Of Complainant : M/s gopalakrishnan Date of Receipt : 01 Sep 2013 Received by : President's Secretariat Officer name : Shri K.C. Jayarajan Officer Designation : Addl CPH Contact Address : Rashtrapati Bhawan New Delhi 110004 e-mail : kc.jayarajan@nic.in Grievance Description : submitted false declaration to TNHB by justice .S.Tamilvanan, R.Banumathi, and SATHYANARAYANAN / justice family member. Sir, Sub: submitted false declaration to TNHB by justice/ justice family member-regd Ref: 1. Assets deceleration by JusticeM. SATHYANARAYANAN. 2. Assets deceleration by JUSTICE Shri R.Banumathi. 3. Assets deceleration by Justice shri S.Tamilvanan 1) While making application to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, He/she has given an undertaking to the effect that neither he/she nor his/ her spouse nor minor dependent children below 21 years of age own plot, house, flat or land in any Corporation, Town Panchayat, Panchayat in India. 2) Now it has come to light that he/ she or his /her spouse having property. 3) Justice/ Justice spouse has given a false Deceleration to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board that neither he/she nor he/her spouse is in possession of a house, plot, flat or land anywhere in India and had fraudulently obtained a housing plot from the TNHB. 4) Justice/ justice spouse has cheated the Tamil Nadu Housing Board to the tune of several thousands and has committed an offence punishable u/s 420 IPC. 5). I request you to kindly investigate the matter further, cancel the allotment order, and appropriate action against justice. 6). I request you to kindly investigate the matter further and cancel the allotment order. 7). I request you to kindly investigate the matter further and take necessary action against justice. 8) I request you to kindly investigate the matter further and take necessary action against concerned officer, TNHB for not verifying properly neither he/she nor he/her spouse is in possession of a house, flat, plot or land anywhere in India. 9) I request you to kindly register a case and investigate the matter further. enclosed details property already owned Current Status : RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE ************************************* Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2013/14091 Name Of Complainant : M/s gopalakrishnan Date of Receipt : 31 Aug 2013 Received by : President's Secretariat Officer name : Shri K.C. Jayarajan Officer Designation : Addl CPH Contact Address : Rashtrapati Bhawan New Delhi 110004 e-mail : kc.jayarajan@nic.in Grievance Description : ex LOK sabha (1999-2004) MP Dr.V.saroja, 8A, ambiga cross street, Velachery, chennai-42 from tamilnadu she was employed as information commissioner in TN state information commissioner from 1 sept 2012 to may 2013, during the period she received MP pension of rs.20,000/- per month PPO NO.MPLOK-0401394 dt 31.05.2004 pension drawen from state bank of india, Guindy, Chennai, BSR code no. 0000956. as per rule if any EX MP working in government agency they ineligible for MP pension. Current Status : RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE ********************************** Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2013/13656 Name Of Complainant : M/s gopalakrishnan Date of Receipt : 25 Aug 2013 Received by : President's Secretariat Forwarded to : SECRETARY P AND AR Officer name : UNDER SECRETARY Officer Designation : UNDER SECRETARY Contact Address : THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI600009 Grievance Description : V.GOPALAKRISHNAN, 13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street, M.G.R.NAGAR, Chennai-78. To His Excly. The President of India New Delhi Sir, Sub: Thiru. K.S. Sripathy, Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Tamil nadu information commission- unbecoming behaviour in the matter of misuse of authority as CIC- removal from service- requested- reg. Thiru. K.S. Sripathy, Chief Information Commissioner has committed the following irregularities and behaved in a manner to affect prejudicially his functions as State CIC.i enclosed detailed complaint about Sripathy Date of Action : 05 Sep 2013 ****** Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2013/13657 Name Of Complainant : M/s gopalakrishnan.v Date of Receipt : 25 Aug 2013 Received by : President's Secretariat Forwarded to : Department of Justice Officer name : Ms. Snehlata Srivastava, Officer Designation : Joint Secretary, Contact Address : R.No: 12, Jaisalmer House, Mansingh Road, New Delhi110011 Contact Number : 23381496 Grievance Description : Sir, Sub:- RTI Act 2005- denial by way of wrong reply- disciplinary action against the PIO/High Court of madras- exemplary compensation to the appellant- reg. Ref:- 1. RTI application dt. 19-3-2012 2. Tamilnadu state information commission Case No. 37497/FB/12 The PIO , High court of madras as well as the appellate authority have acted in a manner to conceal the dissemination of the information, holding it is exempted u/s. 8(1)(j) of the Act. The factual condition is that the Public Authority is not having the information as the form 16 is not prepared by it. The PIO should have forwarded the application u/s. 6(3), where the form 16 is available. A mere perusal of the reply given by the PIO clearly goes to corroborate that he has committed abetting to hide the information from dissemination. By his above dishonest and despicable performance, the PIO has disclosed himself incapable and incompetent to hold the post. Apart from the above he displayed himself not capable enough to understand what was asked for in the RTI application. In such a case he fully deserves to be proceeded against for his dereliction of duty and for his incapacity to hold the position, by way of framing grave charges for dismissal from service. If the above contention is considered as not correct and misfit, then the only indomitable conclusion that survives is that the PIO has committed the following lapses and irregularities: a. He pretends incapable to understand, which amounts to cheating the applicant. b. By his reply, he has ridiculed, insulted and practised teasing of the applicant. c. Above all, he has made mockery of the RTI Act, besides functioning in a manner to undermine the very existence of the Act. By his above mentioned malafide attitudes, the applicant was made to suffer mental agony and irreparable loss of status in the society and caused shame to the applicant. Though the extent of damage caused could not be measured exactly, a soothing compensation roughly valued at Rs. 10 lakhs may be ordered u/s. 19 (8) (b), which may in effect exemplary and thus render justice. V. Gopalakrishnan Date of Action : 26 Aug 2013 Registration Number	:	PRSEC/E/2012/15339
Name Of Complainant	:	Mr. gopalakrishnan
Date of Receipt	:	25 Sep 2012
Received by	:	President's Secretariat
Forwarded to	:	Department of Justice
Officer name	:	Ms. Snehlata Srivastava,
Officer Designation	:	Joint Secretary,
Contact Address	:	R.No: 12, Jaisalmer House,
		Mansingh Road,
		New Delhi110011
Contact Number	:	23381496
Grievance Description	:	sir, The Supreme Court has passed a decision as on 13th of September, 2012 in WP(C) 210 of 2012, Namit Sharma v/s. Union of India. If the order directions given by the Honorable Judges in the said Supreme Court Judgment were to be implemented, then, Senior Retired High Court Supreme Court Judges, post-retirement, in their new role as Information Commissioners, would be working for Quasi-Judicial Courts which is below the rank of Judicial Courts, and as such their decisions would be subject to the scrutiny appellate review of the Sitting Judges of Judicial Courts, which will result into violation of the provisions of Article 124(7) Article 220 of the Constitution of India, as follows: AS PER THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA: Article 124(7) very clearly EXPLICITLY lays down that, no person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India. Likewise, Article 220 very clearly EXPLICITLY lays down that, no person who has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts. please take necessary action. and cancel the appointed rtd judges of supreme court, high court in commission, tribunal and other post in union of india.

justice chandru objected to disclose his income returns and form16 copies for my RTI application.

justice chandru objected to disclose his income returns and form16 copies for my RTI application. why? t secret it?

chennai high court judges, minister, mla are not paying professional tax

chennai high court judges, minister, mla are not paying professional tax. There are not exemption from professional tax as per chennai municpal act 1919 sec 138-H (a)(b)(c). professional tax not deducted from salary for the above person. i am having copy form16 for evidence . I enclosed reply from corporation of chennai regarding exemption. sources RTI