PIO, CIC informing no information available which are to be furnished to the parliament in relation to sec. 8(1)(j) of RTI Act

Public information officer (PIO) of central Information commission informing no information available which are to be furnished to the parliament in relation to sec. 8(1)(j) of RTI Act

confidential
RTI Application under sec 6(1) of RTI Act-2005
From 20-03-2012
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street,
M.G.R.NAGAR,
Chennai-78.

To
The Public Information Officer,
Under Right to Information ACT 2005,
Central Information Commission,
New Delhi.

Sir,
Sub: Under the RTI ACT 2005 sec 6(1), request to furnish information and attested
photo copy.- regarding.
--------
Kindly supply the following information under RTI Act
1. List of the information which are to be furnished to the parliament in relation to sec. 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, by the various department / Public Authorities of state and Central Government.

2. List of the information which are exempted from furnishing to the parliament in relation to sec. 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, by the various department / Public Authorities of state and Central Government.

3. Copy of order, direction or any of its kind received by the CIC from the Parliament/ Govt of India containing the list under item 1 and 2 above enabling the CIC to pronounce orders to the effect of denying the information under RTI application.
I ENCLOSED INDIAN POSTAL ORDER OF RS.10 TOWARDS RTI FEE. NO.

V.GOPALAKRISHNAN

DVAC raid on house of former Anna University V-C

Officers of the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) on Friday carried out raids on the houses of former Anna University Vice-Chancellor D. Viswanathan and four others in connection with alleged irregularities in awarding tenders for procurement of electronic equipment for the university.

Documents pertaining to the tenders were seized from the houses of the suspects, the DVAC said.

Apart from the house of Mr. Viswanathan in Thiruvanmiyur, DVAC teams conducted simultaneous raids on the residences of Professor P. Narayanaswamy and Assistant K. Nagarajan, both from the Department of Computer Science of Anna University in Kottur and Guindy respectively.

The office of Barnas International in Vepery and the residences of its CEO P.M. Najimudeen and Manager R. Yeswanthakumar in Egmore and Avadi respectively were also raided.

DVAC sources said the raid followed a complaint lodged by an RTI activist alleging that Barnas International Private Limited had submitted fabricated quotations in the name of other companies, apart from its own bid.

It subsequently won the orders and delivered computers, CCTV systems and other electronic equipment to the university a few years from 2008.

Computers loaded with software that was not needed for academic purposes were purchased by the university at inflated rates, the sources alleged.

The DVAC sources also said the former V-C had allegedly pressured affiliated colleges to make their procurements from this company.

Keywords: D. Viswanathan, Anna university irregularities, vigilance raid
-----------------------------------
complaint was sent the following office.

sir
i enclosed some documents related to governor son and governor son
friend company. And also i made complaint to president of India.

--------------------------
complaint against the present Governor of Tamilnadu and offical
awarded tender to the below two companies.

To
The President Of India,
The chief justice of India,supreme court,
The Chief justice ofmadras High court,chennai,
The Chief Minister of Tamilnadu,
the commissioner of state vigilance, tamilnadu,
The Director, DVAC,Chennai

sir/madam,

sub: Tender was awarded to Tamilnadu governor Barnala's son
runinng company in the name of Barnas international pvt limited and
barnala's son friend company name datavision 21 runing in the same
premises.-regarding.
------

All tender issued by the university, govt engg college, public
authority in the name of Governor or Chancellor, Governor is the
Appropiate authority of state. In Tamilnadu for all university
Chancellor is Tamilandu Governor Surjit singh Barnala.

Tender was awarded to the present Tamilandu governor's son
company Barnas international pvt limited by the ANNA university,
mettur power station, chennai city police, etc. and also Barnas
international pvt limited manager director Mr. Najimudeen runinng
another company in the nameof Datavision 21 in the same premises of
Barnas international Pvt limited, 2nd floor mr. Najimudeen is a full
time Managing Director of Datavision21 some of the tender awarded to
this company by various govt authority, university, govt college,etc.,
kindly take necessary action against Chancellor, Vice chancellor,
vigilance officers, officals who awarded tender to the above two
companies.


Tamilnadu governor Barnala's son runinng company
in the name of Barnas international pvt limited. company registered in
ROC , CIN :U24230CH2005FTC029150,
ROC code:roc-Chandigarh,
registration number 029150,
with compny limitedby shares,
authorised capital of rs.30,000,000/-
paid upcapital Rs.5,000,000/-.
address of registered office :18 udyog Bhawan, Himalaya Marg, Chandigarh.
date of incorporation: 07/11/2005.Barnala was governor of Tamilnadu
from 3rd november 2004.

Mr. Jasjit Singh Barnala
Mr. Najimudeen
about Barnala: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surjit_Singh_Barnala
aboutcompany http://www.barnascctv.com/Clients.html

V.Gopalakrishnan

RTI application regarding Personal information to president ofindia office

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER (PIO), PRESIDENT OF INDIA OFFICES, FORWARDED MY RTI APPLICATION QUERY NO.1 TO 11 TO LAW MINSITRY AND DOPT REGARDING PERSONAL INFROMATION.

FOR QUERY NO.12. SALARY PAID TO PRESIDENT Rs. 1,50,000/- PER MONTH.

FOR QUERY NO.13, REQUESTED COPY OF FORM-16. PIO REPLIED" information sought on this point is in the nature of personal information, the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest and it would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual. hence it can not be provided as per section 8(1)(j) of the RTI act-2005."
pio forwarded information regarding personal, now he is claiming it is personal information.

for query no.14 pio willfully not forwarded to concern public authority information regarding Income Tax returns copies, why?.





RTI Application under sec 6(1) of RTI Act-2005
From
V. GOPALAKRISHNAN,
13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street,
M.G.R.Nagar,
Chennai-78.

To
The Public Information Officer,
Under Right to Information ACT 2005,
President of India office,
New Delhi.

Sir,
Sub: Under the RTI ACT 2005 sec 6(1), request to furnish information and attested
photo copy.- regarding.
--------
1. Kindly inform, is there any Definition for Personal Information in any Act in India.
2. Kindly inform, is there any Definition for Personal Information in Government order/ Rules/ proceedings/ circular/ clarification, etc.
3. Kindly supply relevant copy of Central Act/ any Act in India/Government order/ Rules/ proceedings/ circular/ clarification, etc., speaks about the Definition for Personal Information.
4. Kindly inform, is there any Definition for Personal Information in Right To Information Act-2005.
5. Kindly supply relevant copy of Right To Information Act-2005, speaks about Definition for Personal Information.
6. Kindly inform relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof that has been supplied voluntarily by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
7. Kindly supply copy of relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof that has been supplied voluntarily by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/ form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
8. Kindly inform relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part there of that has been supplied mandatorily under any rule/statute by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been/ought not to be marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
9. Kindly supply copy of relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof that has been supplied mandatorily under any rule/statute by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been/ought not to be marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/ form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
10. Kindly inform relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof has been supplied by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has been marked as confidential by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
11. Kindly supply copy of relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof has been supplied by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has been marked as confidential by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
12. Kindly inform salary, allowances, etc., paid to President of India Smt. Pratibha Devsingh Patil from year 2007 to till now.
13. Kindly supply copy of Form -16 issued for President of India Smt. Pratibha Devsingh Patil from year 2004 to 2012.
14. Kindly supply of income tax returns filed by President of India Smt. Pratibha Devsingh Patil from year 2004 to 2012 to income Tax Department.
If any information not available, kindly forward to consent office/department as per sec 6(3) of RTI Act
I ENCLOSED INDIAN POSTAL ORDER OF RS.10 TOWARDS RTI FEE. NO.

V.GOPALAKRISHNAN

RTI application regarding Personal information to INCOME TAX DEPTCHENNAI

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER (PIO), INCOMETAX DEP, CHENNAI CLEARLY MENTIONED THAT THERE WAS NO DEFINITION FOR PERSONAL INFORMATION.

THEN HOW INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT CLAIMING INCOME TAX RETURNS AS PERSONAL INFORMATION?


RTI Application under sec 6(1) of RTI Act-2005
From
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street,
M.G.R.NAGAR,
Chennai-78.

To
The Public Information Officer,
Under Right to Information ACT 2005,
Central Information commission,
NewDelhi.

Sir,
Sub: Under the RTI ACT 2005 sec 6(1), request to furnish information and attested
photo copy.- regarding.
--------
1. Kindly inform, is there any Definition for Personal Information in any Act in India.
2. Kindly inform, is there any Definition for Personal Information in Government order/ Rules/ proceedings/ circular/ clarification, etc.
3. Kindly supply relevant copy of Central Act/ any Act in India/Government order/ Rules/ proceedings/ circular/ clarification, etc., speaks about the Definition for Personal Information.
4. Kindly inform, is there any Definition for Personal Information in Right To Information Act-2005.
5. Kindly supply relevant copy of Right To Information Act-2005, speaks about Definition for Personal Information.
6. Kindly inform relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof that has been supplied voluntarily by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
7. Kindly supply copy of relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof that has been supplied voluntarily by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/ form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
8. Kindly inform relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part there of that has been supplied mandatorily under any rule/statute by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been/ought not to be marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.

9. Kindly supply copy of relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof that has been supplied mandatorily under any rule/statute by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been/ought not to be marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/ form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
10. Kindly inform relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof has been supplied by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has been marked as confidential by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
11. Kindly supply copy of relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof has been supplied by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has been marked as confidential by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
I ENCLOSED INDIAN POSTAL ORDER OF RS.10 TOWARDS RTI FEE. NO.

V.GOPALAKRISHNAN

RTI application regarding Personal information to CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (CIC) HAS FURNISHED TO DIFFERENT REPLY FOR SAME rti APPLICATION. CIC CLEARLY MENTIONED THAT NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE FOR SL. NO.1 TO 4 COPIES FOR PERSONAL INFORMATION. SEE VAGUE REPLY GIVEN BY PIO OF CIC REST OF QUERY


RTI Application under sec 6(1) of RTI Act-2005
From
V.GOPALAKRISHNAN,
13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi Street,
M.G.R.NAGAR,
Chennai-78.

To
The Public Information Officer,
Under Right to Information ACT 2005,
Central Information commission,
NewDelhi.

Sir,
Sub: Under the RTI ACT 2005 sec 6(1), request to furnish information and attested
photo copy.- regarding.
--------
1. Kindly inform, is there any Definition for Personal Information in any Act in India.
2. Kindly inform, is there any Definition for Personal Information in Government order/ Rules/ proceedings/ circular/ clarification, etc.
3. Kindly supply relevant copy of Central Act/ any Act in India/Government order/ Rules/ proceedings/ circular/ clarification, etc., speaks about the Definition for Personal Information.
4. Kindly inform, is there any Definition for Personal Information in Right To Information Act-2005.
5. Kindly supply relevant copy of Right To Information Act-2005, speaks about Definition for Personal Information.
6. Kindly inform relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof that has been supplied voluntarily by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
7. Kindly supply copy of relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof that has been supplied voluntarily by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/ form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
8. Kindly inform relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part there of that has been supplied mandatorily under any rule/statute by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been/ought not to be marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.

9. Kindly supply copy of relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof that has been supplied mandatorily under any rule/statute by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has not been/ought not to be marked as confidential (not mentioned as confidential) by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/ form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
10. Kindly inform relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof has been supplied by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has been marked as confidential by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
11. Kindly supply copy of relevant section of Right To information which states that any information or record, or part thereof has been supplied by an individual or by any public authority to other public authority and has been marked as confidential by that individual/authority while submitting documents/letter/form/ application etc., should not be disclosed under right to information Act.
I ENCLOSED INDIAN POSTAL ORDER OF RS.10 TOWARDS RTI FEE. NO.

V.GOPALAKRISHNAN

appointment of CBI shri.A.P.SINGH IPS 1974

APPLICATION U/s 6 (1) R/w 7 (1) proviso OF RTI ACT Issuable
in 48 HOURS.
From 28.01.12
V.Gopalakrishnan
13/7, Pammal Nalla Thambi street,
M.G.R.Nagar,
Chennai-78.

To
The Public information Officer,
DoPT, New Delhi.

Sir/ Madam,
Sub: Under the Right to Information Act 2005, sec 6(1) . I request you to furnish
Some information about Selection of CBI director.- regarding.


INFORMATION SOUGHT.

1. Provide certified copy of all records relating to the selection of the present CBI director.

V. Gopalakrishnan

Please further note that the information sought is covered by section 4 of RTI Act.
I enclosed postal order no. 99E 878251 Rs.10/- towards RTI fee.


********************************************
PIO, DOPT REPLY

Tamil Nadu: HC Moved for Deducting INCOME TAX for MPs, MLAs

http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=753965

Tamil Nadu: HC Moved for Deducting I-T for MPs, MLAs
PTI | Chennai | Mar 02, 2012

An anti-corruption association has moved the Madras High Court for a
direction to the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs and Tamil Nadu
Legislative Assembly Secretariat to deduct tax at source for MPs and
MLAs in keeping with section 190 of the Income Tax Act 1961.

When the petition filed by C Selvaraj, President of Association of
Transparency and Anti-Corruption, also seeking a direction to the
authorities concerned to pay allowances only on valid claims, with
proof attached came up for hearing today, the First Bench headed by
Chief Justice M Y Eqbal adjourned it for hearing on March 13.

Claiming that citizens of the country, including himself, paid income
tax and other taxes, subject to their income being above Rs 1.60 lakh
per annum, the petitioner alleged TDS was not being applied to the MPs
and state legislators receiving payments totalling Rs 11.40 lakh and
Rs 5.60 lakh per annum (excluding exemptions) respectively.

He claimed that a research of data filed by state MLAs for the period
2006-11 showed eight MLAs did not have a permanent account number
(PAN) while six others claimed nil income. He also alleged 47 others
had under-reported their income.

The petitioner said he had sent complaints on August 4 and December 1
last year to the Director General of Income Tax but there was no
action.

He sought a direction to the I-T DG to recover income tax not paid by
MPs and MLAs during the period.
Filed On: Mar 02, 2012 23:18 IST